I also asked myself, and all of you, how does Scott Walker's use of new technologies compare to that of the Democrats in the 2008 election? Is it effective? Has the Republican Party finally figured out that younger generations don't want to see billboards and yard signs? Digital natives clearly need interaction and technology to capture their attention.
While these questions certainly served as launch pad for some of my research and interests, I'd like to pose a separate set of questions related to my section of today's presentation on Internet Users and Audiences.
1. Are conservatives utilizing new technologies better than they were, say 2 years ago?
2. Do you think the internet encourages democratic participation? Think about the infrastructure. I.e., how do search engines work?
4. Do these Internet users subject themselves to homogenous audiences and echo-chambers by actively participating in RedState.com and MyScottSpot.com?
3. Are citizen journalism models that rely on user generate content effective ways to build communities online? What type of Internet user might you expect to use these platforms?
4. Does the element of "Fandom" created by Scott Walker's multi-platform campaign encourage emotion-based voting? What about in 2008?
Here is a brief quote from Baym's (1) article on Swedish music fandom:
"Fandoms pool and generate collective intelligence
and affect. Individuals create self concepts and self
presentations within fan groups. Some become well
known to other fans through fandom. These groups
also develop a sense of shared identity. Personal
relationships are formed amongst some members of fan
groups. Particular fandoms may have a shared ethos, but
disagreement within fan communities is both common
and, often, desirable. "
No comments:
Post a Comment